Case 6007714/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Rehman v Cardiff City Transport Services Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007714/2025
- Decision date
- 20 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Rehman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. The written judgment records that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and that the claim was not well-founded.
The Tribunal also dismissed the claim for wrongful dismissal, described as notice pay. The judgment records that the claimant was in breach of contract by his act of gross misconduct. Written reasons were not included because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for wrongful dismissal (notice pay) and states that it was not well-founded and was dismissed because the claimant was in breach of contract by his act of gross misconduct. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.