Case 6007723/2024 · Employment Tribunal
did not attend For the v Mr David Wild (Payroll Manager — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007723/2024
- Decision date
- 30 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
did not attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing and did not contact the Tribunal before or during the hearing to explain any difficulty attending. The Tribunal was satisfied that he had received notice of the hearing on 7 August 2024.
The claimant had brought an unlawful deduction from wages complaint for £417 after working briefly for the respondent from 7 to 8 July 2024. The respondent's grounds of resistance said it had asked the claimant for Home Office right to work information, and Mr Wild said the claimant would have been paid for the time worked if he had provided confirmation of his right to work.
In the absence of evidence or submissions to the contrary from the claimant, the Tribunal was satisfied that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. The claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant identified an unlawful deduction from wages complaint in the sum of £417. The tribunal dismissed the claim after the claimant did not attend and, in the absence of evidence or submissions to the contrary, found it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.