Case 6007743/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Roscoe v TBD Holdings Manchester Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007743/2025
- Decision date
- 20 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Roscoe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 17 July 2025 before Employment Judge Shotter sitting alone, the judgment was given by consent. The tribunal upheld the claimant Miss L Roscoe's complaint of wrongful dismissal. It found that TBD Holdings Manchester Ltd was in breach of contract because it did not pay one week's notice pay, and awarded £485.81 as the net value due to the claimant.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,943.24, described as the net sum deducted. In addition, the holiday pay complaint succeeded: the tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay in breach of contract and in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and awarded £194.24 net. The written record states that interest is payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, with the relevant decision day being 20 August 2025 and the stipulated rate 8% per annum, but no interest amount is set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held the respondent was in breach of contract for failing to pay one week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £486 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered repayment of the net sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £1,943 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found holiday pay had not been paid in breach of contract and regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £194 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,623
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.