Case 6007848/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Dawkins v Switch My Business Group Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007848/2024
- Decision date
- 12 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Dawkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 6 August 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Camp decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Switch My Business Group Limited made an unauthorised deduction from Mr T Dawkins's wages during the period 27 May 2024 to 5 July 2024. The unlawful deduction from wages claim was therefore upheld.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £4,989.20. The judgment set out calculations for 27 May 2024 to 31 May 2024, 3 June 2024 to 28 June 2024, and 1 July 2024 to 5 July 2024, including credit for £497.24 already paid on 5 July 2024; the stated bottom-line order was £4,989.20.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment orders payment of £4,989.20 for unauthorised deductions during 27 May 2024 to 5 July 2024. The extracted line-item figures do not arithmetically reconcile exactly with the stated bottom-line order, so the stated order is used. | Upheld | — | £4,989 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,989
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.