Case 6007852/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Van goor den oosterlingh v Gibex One Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007852/2024
- Decision date
- 24 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Van goor den oosterlingh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent, Gibex One Ltd, confirmed by correspondence dated 26 June 2025 that it would not participate in the hearing and did not attend. Employment Judge Gray proceeded under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024 and heard the claim at Southampton (by video) on 30 June 2025, with the Claimant appearing in person.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant's complaints for notice pay and unpaid holiday pay succeeded. The Respondent was ordered to pay a total gross sum of £2,565, comprising £675 in notice pay and £1,890 in accrued but untaken holiday pay. The holiday pay figure was calculated on the basis of £675 x 52 weeks / 26 / 10 days a fortnight x 14 days holiday accrued.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will only be provided if requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim succeeded; awarded £675 gross. | Upheld | — | £675 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday pay awarded £1,890 gross, calculated as £675 x 52 / 26 / 10 x 14. | Upheld | — | £1,890 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,565
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.