Case 6007865/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B McLeod v Marks and Spencer plc — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007865/2026
- Decision date
- 23 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B McLeod
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr B McLeod applied for interim relief in proceedings against Marks & Spencer plc. The application related to a complaint that the reason or principal reason for his dismissal was that he had made a protected disclosure.
Employment Judge Dick refused the interim relief application. The judgment records that the Tribunal was not satisfied that it was likely, when determining the related complaint, to find that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was the claimant's protected disclosure.
No monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment records that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refused an application for interim relief connected to a protected disclosure dismissal complaint; it did not finally determine the underlying complaint. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.