Case 6007879/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Tanner v Powersystems UK Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007879/2024
- Decision date
- 23 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Tanner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Tanner's claim against Powersystems UK Ltd was heard by Employment Judge Ferguson at Bristol by video on 31 March 2025. The Tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying dismissal complaint.
The Tribunal found that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit. It further found that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. On that basis, the Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim and dismissed it.
No monetary remedy was awarded, and the judgment records only the jurisdictional dismissal. The written record was sent to the parties on 23 April 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on limitation grounds. The Tribunal found the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not reasonably practicable to do so, so it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.