Case 6007890/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Monali Mohite v Westpak Group Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007890/2026
- Decision date
- 24 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Monali Mohite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMonali Mohite's unfair dismissal complaint against Westpak Group Limited was struck out. The tribunal found that she had been employed for less than two years, below the qualifying period required by section 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. A letter dated 27 April 2026 warned her that the tribunal proposed to strike out the complaint on that basis.
In her responses, Mohite did not identify a relevant exception to the qualifying service requirement or provide an explanation that would allow the tribunal to identify one. The tribunal found that, despite having an opportunity to respond, she had not given an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out. Her separate holiday pay complaint was unaffected by this judgment. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Exceptions under the other subsections of section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.