Case 6007942/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Duggan v GB Intelligence Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007942/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mr Fryer, Ms Hartwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Duggan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSitting at Cardiff with lay members, Employment Judge Leith found that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and pregnancy and maternity discrimination both succeeded. The respondent did not attend or have representation, the claimant appearing in person.
The tribunal applied a 15% uplift to the discrimination compensation on the basis that the respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice. The award (inclusive of uplift where stated) comprised £6,745.79 for loss of earnings and pension, £170.20 interest on that loss (8% per annum, 115 days), £13,800 for injury to feelings, £691.58 interest on injury to feelings (8% per annum, 229 days), and £500 for loss of statutory rights attached to the unfair dismissal claim.
The respondent was ordered to pay a total of £21,907.57. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Loss of statutory rights of £500 awarded for the unfair dismissal claim. Other compensation components attached to the discrimination claim. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Compensation included a 15% ACAS Code uplift because the tribunal found the respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the Code. Award components covered loss of earnings/pension, injury to feelings, and interest, but the judgment does not provide a single per-claim sum for this complaint. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,908
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £7,246
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ACAS Code of Practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.