Case 6007960/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Moon v Grace Consultancy Global Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007960/2025
- Decision date
- 18 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Moon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant did not attend the hearing listed for 14 July 2025 and had not attempted to log in by the start time. Tribunal staff tried to contact him by telephone and email, and the start of the hearing was delayed by about 45 minutes to allow him time to respond.
The Tribunal file also showed that the Claimant had not uploaded the bundle required for the hearing and had not replied to the Tribunal's letter of 9 July 2025 requesting further information. In those circumstances, Employment Judge Leith concluded that all practicable enquiries had been made about the non-attendance and that it was in the interests of justice to dismiss the claim under Rule 47.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing category identifies unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment gives only a Rule 47 dismissal at a preliminary hearing and does not set out merits findings. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing category identifies working time. The judgment gives only a Rule 47 dismissal at a preliminary hearing and does not set out merits findings. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.