Case 6008040/2025 · Employment Tribunal
T Gower v Emcor UK — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008040/2025
- Decision date
- 8 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
T Gower
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only claim identified in the judgment was an unfair dismissal claim by T Gower against EMCOR UK. The Tribunal wrote to the Claimant on 8 May 2025 and 29 May 2025, giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out because the Claimant did not appear to have the requisite two years' service.
The Claimant did not make any representations in writing or otherwise and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal claim on the basis that the Claimant did not have two years' service and/or had failed to actively pursue the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal gave the Claimant opportunities by letters dated 8 May 2025 and 29 May 2025 to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out because the Claimant did not appear to have the requisite 2 years' service. The Claimant made no representations in writing or otherwise and did not request a hearing. The claim was struck out for not having 2 years' service and/or failing to actively pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.