Case 6008076/2024 · Employment Tribunal
L Bortali v Oven Support England Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008076/2024
- Decision date
- 29 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Bortali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 8 August 2024 against Oven Support Limited, and Employment Judge Midgley later allowed the respondent name to be amended to Oven Support England Limited. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the tribunal determined the claim under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered Oven Support England Limited to pay the claimant £1,390 gross. The judgment records the same figure as the total sum payable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that Oven Support England Limited had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,390 gross. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the claim was determined under rule 22. | Upheld | — | £1,390 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,390
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,390
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.