Case 6008085/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E MacPhee v Easington Colliery Butchers — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008085/2025
- Decision date
- 8 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E MacPhee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 10 March 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross amount of £575. The hearing listed for 28 May 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; the award was not split between the claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £575
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.