Case 6008124/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Tanith T Rose v Marcus Lamb — 2024
- Case reference
- 6008124/2024
- Decision date
- 2 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri Hurst
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Tanith T Rose
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningTanith T Rose brought a single complaint of unfair dismissal against Marcus Lamb. The Tribunal recorded that the claimant had been ordered to explain why the claim should not be struck out because she did not have the required two years' service.
The claimant's response did not identify any basis on which the two-year qualifying period under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 should be disapplied. On that basis, the Tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to deal with the unfair dismissal complaint.
The complaint of unfair dismissal was therefore struck out. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant responded to an order to explain why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out, but the response disclosed no reason why the 2-year qualifying period in s108 Employment Rights Act 1996 should not apply. The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to deal with the complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.