Case 6008152/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. V. Kranha v Byerley Turk E-Commerce Logistics Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6008152/2024
- Decision date
- 10 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J. Galbraith-Marten
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. V. Kranha
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms V. Kranha, brought a holiday pay complaint against Byerley Turk E-Commerce Logistics Ltd. Employment Judge J. Galbraith-Marten sat alone in London Central Employment Tribunal and decided the case on 3 December 2024.
The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well founded. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages by failing to pay her for holidays that had accrued but were not taken when her employment ended.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £839.24, described as the gross sum deducted. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any tax and national insurance due on that amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held the complaint in respect of holiday pay was well founded because the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £839 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £839
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.