Case 6008158/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 6008158/2025
- Decision date
- 22 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal dismissed Mr S Gray’s complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against DC Lakeside Limited and East Fellgate Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquation). Mr Gray did not attend or have representation at the final hearing on 22 June 2026.
Employment Judge Martin considered Rule 38 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and determined that Mr Gray was not actively pursuing his claim. He had failed to comply with an order made on 26 March 2026 and failed to attend the final hearing without explanation, having previously been issued with a strike-out warning for non-attendance. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reasons state that a strike-out warning had previously been issued in July 2026, although the judgment and final hearing are dated 22 June 2026; that chronology is unclear. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.