Case 6008159/2025 · Employment Tribunal
N Brearley v Razors Edge Group Limited trading as James Roberts Beauty — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008159/2025
- Decision date
- 23 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Brearley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 10 March 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Phil Allen decided that a determination could properly be made of part of the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The title was amended to Razors Edge Group Limited trading as James Roberts Beauty to reflect the correct respondent name.
On the part of the claim determined in this judgment, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The award was calculated on the basis of 11 complete years at one week’s pay for each year when the claimant was aged between 22 and 41, and 9 complete years at one and a half weeks’ pay for each year when the claimant was 41 or older, with service capped at 20 years.
Using a weekly pay figure of £326.92, the tribunal calculated the redundancy payment as £4,413.42 plus £3,596.12, giving a total of £8,009.54. The judgment records that the respondent must pay the claimant £8,009.54 in total.
The tribunal also noted that the claimant’s outstanding complaints would proceed to hearing. The accompanying notice states that interest is payable under article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, with the relevant decision day identified as 23 September 2025 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum, but no separate interest sum is quantified in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal determined only part of the claim under rule 22 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £8,009.54. | Upheld | — | £8,010 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,010
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.