Case 6008242/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Marcia Campbell v Caerus Lifecare Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6008242/2025
- Decision date
- 1 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baran
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Marcia Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe complaints of unfair dismissal and failure to pay holiday pay were dismissed following their withdrawal by Marcia Campbell.
The Tribunal found that Caerus Lifecare Limited made an unauthorised deduction from Ms Campbell's pay in respect of notice pay due when her employment terminated on 15 October 2024. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £2,930.62. Under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Tribunal also determined that Ms Campbell was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,795.56 following the termination of her employment, producing a total recorded award of £7,726.18.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross sum awarded for notice pay due upon termination. | Upheld | — | £2,931 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,796 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,726
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.