Case 6008281/2025 · Employment Tribunal
L Slark v Meshii Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008281/2025
- Decision date
- 5 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Slark
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 11 March 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim, or part of it, could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £2,800 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £3,000 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,000. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,750. The total amount payable was £10,550.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,800 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,550
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.