Case 6008325/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F J Samateh v Axelbond Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6008325/2024
- Decision date
- 30 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F J Samateh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 25 November 2024, Employment Judge Dunlop heard the claimant in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal held that Axelbond Ltd had made unauthorised deductions by failing to pay holiday pay that had accrued and remained outstanding at the termination of employment. It accepted the calculation that the claimant had worked 465.75 hours, accrued 56 hours of paid holiday at the 12.07% rate, received 26 hours, and had 23 hours unpaid after allowing for the 3 hours deducted at termination.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions by failing to pay accrued holiday pay at termination. It calculated 23 hours outstanding at the claimant's gross hourly rate of £22, producing an award of £506 gross. | Upheld | — | £506 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant accepted he was not entitled to additional notice pay and said that part of the claim form had been made in error. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £506
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.