Case 6008433/2024 · Employment Tribunal
James Bradbury v Better Together Community Support Group for Stoke-on-Trent and NUL — 2026
- Case reference
- 6008433/2024
- Decision date
- 8 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
James Bradbury
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the respondent had not presented a response within the relevant time limit. Having regard to Rule 22, Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, the Tribunal entered judgment in default.
The judgment states that James Bradbury was dismissed for breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent, Better Together Community Support Group for Stoke-on-Trent and NUL, was ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the net sum of £1,715.91. No other claim outcomes or remedy components are recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Default judgment under Rule 22 after the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time limit; the judgment describes the claim as breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £1,716 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,716
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22, Schedule 1 of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.