Case 6008443/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Elizabeth Lawrence v Achieve Together Limited AT A HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008443/2024
- Decision date
- 12 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Elizabeth Lawrence
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Leeds on 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11 and 12 November 2025, Employment Judge Lancaster found that Achieve Together Limited had made a series of unauthorised deductions from Elizabeth Lawrence's wages by failing to pay her full contractual sick pay, inclusive of SSP, for a period of six months from 12 March 2024. The written record records that remedy on that claim was adjourned to a date to be fixed if not agreed.
The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed. The written record does not set out separate written reasons for those dismissals or any monetary award beyond the liability finding on the unlawful deductions claim.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a series of unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay full contractual sick pay, inclusive of SSP, for six months from 12 March 2024. Remedy was adjourned. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under the judgment's statement that all other claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed under the judgment's statement that all other claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Dismissed under the judgment's statement that all other claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Covers the written pay statement issue reflected in the case listing; the written record does not separate it from the other dismissed claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.