Case 6008454/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hewitt v Concept Golf Lexden Wood Limited (Involuntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008454/2025
- Decision date
- 14 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bann REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Hewitt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought claims for unlawful deduction of wages (arrears of pay), holiday pay and notice pay against his former employer, which had entered voluntary liquidation on 14 May 2025. He sought £1,423.30, said to be a combination of worked hours and holiday pay. The insolvency practitioner notified the Tribunal that the Claimant had also submitted a claim to the Redundancy Payments Service for monies owed, to be paid in line with statutory limits.
The Notice of Hearing required the Claimant to set out a calculation of the sums claimed and to provide supporting documents. The Claimant did not supply any documentation and did not attend the hearing held by CVP on 14 August 2025. The Tribunal clerk telephoned the Claimant, who ended the call abruptly, and a further email was sent allowing additional time to attend.
Applying rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, Employment Judge Bann was satisfied that reasonable efforts had been made to contact the Claimant. Having considered the claim and finding insufficient evidence to support it, and in light of confirmation that the Claimant had applied to the Redundancy Payments Service, the Judge dismissed the claims. The Respondent's name was also amended to Concept Golf Lexden Wood Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation).
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay dismissed. Claimant did not attend the hearing and provided no supporting documentation; insolvency practitioner confirmed claim made to Redundancy Payments Service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim dismissed for the same reasons: non-attendance and insufficient evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim (breach of contract) dismissed for the same reasons: non-attendance and insufficient evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.