Case 6008481/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M. A Chillon Terron v China Unicom (Europe) Operations Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6008481/2024
- Decision date
- 18 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eleena Misra
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M. A Chillon Terron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre on 18 September 2024, Employment Judge Eleena Misra KC heard the claimant's application for interim relief under sections 128-129 Employment Rights Act 1996. The application was made in relation to the claimant's claim for automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 103A ERA 1996.
The tribunal dismissed the interim relief application. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days, so the extract does not set out further reasoning or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief under sections 128-129 Employment Rights Act 1996 in relation to a claim for automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 103A ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- ss.128-129 ERA 1996
- s.103A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.