Case 6008490/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Malpas v AVH Plumbing and Heating Midlands Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6008490/2024
- Decision date
- 25 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Malpas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant and respondent did not attend the public CVP hearing on 25 February 2026. The Tribunal tried to contact both parties by telephone and email on 24 and 25 February 2026, but received no response; the emails were returned as undeliverable and both mobile telephones were switched off with no voicemail facility.
The Tribunal recorded that the parties had failed to comply with orders dated 19 June 2025 and that it appeared the claim was not actively pursued. All claims were dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed pursuant to rule 47; the specific claim particulars are not set out in the short judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed pursuant to rule 47; the specific claim particulars are not set out in the short judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.