Case 6008511/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Jenks v Jenks UK Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) [1] The Secretary of State [2] — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008511/2025
- Decision date
- 29 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Duncan Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff via video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Jenks
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing on 29 September 2025. Tribunal staff contacted him by telephone, and he confirmed that he would not be attending and wanted to withdraw his claim.
The Tribunal recorded that it received email confirmation at 10:20am that the claimant wanted to withdraw his claim. The claims for failure to pay a redundancy payment, failure by the Secretary of State to make an insolvency payment, and failure to pay statutory annual leave were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the claimant did not attend, confirmed he wanted to withdraw his claim, and that the claim for failure to pay a redundancy payment was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment describes this as a claim for failure by the Secretary of State to make an insolvency payment and states that it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as a claim for failure to pay statutory annual leave and states that it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.