Case 6008528/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Sanders v Power Epos Systems Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008528/2024
- Decision date
- 21 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge HART Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Sanders
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 14 August 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal upheld three claims: unpaid wages for 13 working days between 1 July and 17 July 2024 (£3,261.18 net); one month's notice pay (£5,435.30 net); and unpaid mileage expenses incurred between 20 May and 17 June 2024 (£356.40). A further claim for financial loss arising out of the non-payment of wages was not upheld, the claimant having failed to provide evidence that the loss was directly caused by or attributable to the non-payment of wages as required by a Tribunal letter of 12 November 2024.
The hearing listed for 29 January 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages between 1 July 2024 and 17 July 2024 (13 working days). Judgment uses the phrase 'breach of contract unlawful deduction of wages'; classified here as unlawful deduction of wages as that is the closer statutory match for unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £3,261 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to pay one month's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £5,435 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to repay mileage expenses incurred between 20 May 2024 and 17 June 2024. | Upheld | — | £356 |
| Other | Claim for financial loss arising out of the non-payment of wages was not upheld; the tribunal found the claimant had not provided evidence that the loss was directly caused by or attributable to the non-payment of wages as required by the Tribunal letter of 12 November 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,053
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22, Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.