Case 6008575/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Warner v Burrito Picante (Altrincham) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008575/2024
- Decision date
- 8 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Warner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent did not present a valid response on time. It decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
On the substance of the claim, the tribunal found that Burrito Picante (Sheffield) Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr E Warner's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay him £240.24.
The judgment also states that the hearing listed for 25 February 2025 was cancelled. No separate breakdown of remedy components, legal test, or lay members is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £240.24. The judgment also records that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and that the determination was made under rule 22. | Upheld | — | £240 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £240
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.