Case 6008587/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Hall v London North Eastern Railway Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008587/2024
- Decision date
- 27 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Ms B Hall brought a claim against London North Eastern Railway Ltd, heard at Leeds by CVP video link on 27 August 2025 before Employment Judge Shepherd. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Burns, solicitor.
The judgment states that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and that it was dismissed. The written judgment does not set out the jurisdictional reason, the factual background, or any detailed findings because reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
No monetary award or other remedy was recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing category identifies the claim as Unlawful Deduction from Wages. The written judgment itself does not describe the underlying claim type and states only that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.