Case 6008681/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Hanson v The Coffee Barn Limited and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008681/2024
- Decision date
- 8 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms T Hanson
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made by consent. The tribunal recorded that the holiday pay complaint was well-founded because the respondent failed to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken when her employment ended, and ordered payment of 2891.43 net.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant was dismissed without notice and that her wrongful dismissal claim for notice pay was well-founded, with 515.79 net ordered. The claimant withdrew unlawful deduction claims relating to reduction of hours not worked and withdrew her redundancy payment claim; the judgment states that other unlawful deduction of wages claims will continue to trial.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded by consent that the holiday pay complaint was well-founded and that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay accrued but untaken holiday at termination. | Upheld | — | £2,891 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal recorded by consent that the claimant was dismissed without notice and that her notice pay claim was well-founded. The PDF text states 515.79 net but does not show a currency symbol in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £516 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's other unlawful deduction of wages claims relating to the reduction of hours not worked were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment states that all other unlawful deduction of wages claims will continue to trial. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claimant's redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,407
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.