Case 6008746/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K King v Little Robins Nursery & Pre-School Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008746/2025
- Decision date
- 4 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K King
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent’s name to Little Robins Nursery & Pre-School Limited and refused the respondent’s application for an extension of time to submit its response. It then determined the claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages claims for October, November and December 2024.
Those claims succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the total gross sum of £1,302.38, made up of a £350.00 shortfall for October 2024, £317.46 for November 2024, and £634.92 for unpaid salary for December 2024.
The award was expressed as a gross figure, with the respondent permitted to make any deductions due for tax and national insurance contributions before payment is made to the claimant. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant’s claims for unlawful deduction of wages for October, November and December 2024 succeeded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,302.38, made up of £350.00 for October, £317.46 for November, and £634.92 for December. The respondent’s application for an extension of time to submit its response was refused. Payment was ordered on a gross basis, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance contributions due before payment. | Upheld | — | £1,302 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,302
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.