Case 6008778/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Emery v Tower Cinemas (Blackpool) Ltd (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6008778/2025
- Decision date
- 19 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Emery
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination against the respondent, which was in creditors' voluntary liquidation and did not attend the CVP hearing before Employment Judge Dunlop. The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had insufficient continuity of service, and that claim was dismissed.
The disability discrimination claim was upheld. The Tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 at all material times. It found the respondent had failed to make reasonable adjustments between mid-September 2024 and February 2025 by not offering the claimant daytime shifts, and that the termination of his contract with effect from 7 March 2025 was an unlawful act of discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010.
The respondent was ordered to pay £27,304.00 in compensation, comprising £2,304.00 gross for shifts the claimant would have been allocated had reasonable adjustments been made (calculated as 16 weeks x 2 shifts per week x 6 hours x £12 per hour) and £25,000 for injury to feelings. No award was made for psychiatric injury or aggravated damages.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal complaint as the claimant had insufficient continuity of service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Upheld on two bases: failure to make reasonable adjustments (mid-September 2024 to February 2025, failing to offer daytime shifts) and discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010 in respect of the termination effective 7 March 2025. | Upheld | Disability | £27,304 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £27,304
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,304
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.