Case 6008885/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. J. Rimmer v Marks and Spencer plc — 2026
- Case reference
- 6008885/2025
- Decision date
- 12 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. J. Rimmer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found Mrs J Rimmer's complaint of unfair constructive dismissal against Marks and Spencer PLC well-founded and held that she had been unfairly dismissed. The written judgment records the outcome but not the oral reasons for it.
The tribunal found a 20% chance that Mrs Rimmer would have been fairly dismissed in any event. After applying that deduction, it awarded a basic award of £8,250 and a compensatory award of £11,946.54, making £20,196.54 in total. The accompanying notice states that interest would accrue at 8% a year from 30 July 2026 if the award were not paid in full within 14 days after 29 July 2026; it does not quantify an interest sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the complaint as unfair constructive dismissal and states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | £20,197 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,197
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £8,250
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £11,947
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.