Case 6008888/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A Whybrow v Greater Manchester Sports Clubs Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008888/2025
- Decision date
- 23 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A Whybrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. On that basis, the tribunal accepted the claim and made findings on the monetary claims before it.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered payment of £7,207.08, made up of one month’s unpaid wages for December 2024 (£2,333.33), agreed commission on the claimant’s own sales (£3,045.00), and agreed commission on sales of the claimant’s team (£1,828.75).
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £538.46, described as one week’s statutory notice. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and ordered £1,211.54. The total payable under the judgment was £8,957.08. The separate interest notice recorded that no interest is payable if the sum is paid in full within 14 days of the relevant decision day, that interest would otherwise run from 24 October 2025, and that the stipulated rate was 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages covering one month’s unpaid wages for December 2024, agreed commission on C’s own sales, and agreed commission on sales of C’s team. | Upheld | — | £7,207 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages equivalent to one week’s statutory notice, calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as post-employment notice pay. | Upheld | — | £538 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,212 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,957
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Employment Tribunal (Interest) Order 1990, article 12
- section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.