Case 6008908/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Rubezius v Switch My Business Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008908/2024
- Decision date
- 26 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Rubezius
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ross heard the case in Manchester by CVP on 20 February 2025, with the respondent absent. The tribunal found three money claims well-founded: an unauthorised deduction from wages of five weeks' pay, notice pay, and accrued but untaken holiday pay. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,500, £500 and £300 respectively.
The claimant's public interest disclosure detriment claim was no longer being pursued and was dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal ordered payment of £3,300 within 7 days. The judgment contains no fuller reasons beyond the numbered orders and the standard interest notice.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages of five weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay; awarded as one week's pay in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday on termination. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Whistleblowing | Public interest disclosure detriment claim no longer pursued and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.