Case 6008919/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ntiege v Navigo health and Social Care CIC — 2024
- Case reference
- 6008919/2024
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ntiege
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 5 December 2024, Employment Judge Welch issued a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52 in case 6008919/2024. The tribunal dismissed, following withdrawal by the claimant, the complaints listed as unfair dismissal, indirect sex and/or race discrimination, and detriment and/or automatic unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures (whistleblowing).
The judgment records no merits findings and no monetary award. It also states that the claimant's remaining complaints of direct sex discrimination, direct race discrimination, victimisation and unlawful deductions from wages would proceed to a five-day final hearing beginning on 24 August 2026.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Judgment describes this complaint as 'indirect sex and/or race discrimination' and dismisses it following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Judgment describes this complaint as 'detriment and/or automatic unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures (whistleblowing)' and dismisses it following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.