Case 6008924/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Nowak v Taillevent Operations Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008924/2024
- Decision date
- 8 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Nowak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R Nowak, brought claims against Taillevent Operations Limited that were heard at London Central on 25, 28, 29 and 30 July 2025 before Employment Judge Joffe. The claimant represented himself and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment is dated 6 August 2025 and records that the claims were not well-founded.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim of automatically unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures. It also dismissed the claimant's wrongful dismissal / breach of contract claim, treated here as separate wrongful dismissal and breach of contract claims because the judgment uses both terms in the same disposition. The judgment gives no separate monetary award and records no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the claimant's claim of automatically unfair dismissal for making protected disclosures was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the wrongful dismissal aspect was not well-founded and was dismissed as part of the claimant's wrongful dismissal / breach of contract claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract aspect was not well-founded and was dismissed as part of the claimant's wrongful dismissal / breach of contract claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the claim for breach of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claim for unlawful deductions from wages was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.