Case 6008926/2025 · Employment Tribunal
A Pardo v Mobivape Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6008926/2025
- Decision date
- 2 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Pardo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London South by CVP on 2 September 2025, Employment Judge Rice-Birchall found that A Pardo’s holiday pay complaint against Mobivape Ltd was well-founded. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay holiday accrued but untaken on the date the claimant’s employment ended, and awarded £827.08. The claimant was recorded as being responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum.
The tribunal also recorded that the respondent failed to give the claimant written itemised pay statements required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 in September 2024. It further found that, when the proceedings were begun, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars.
In relation to that breach, the tribunal found there were no exceptional circumstances making an award of an amount equal to two weeks’ gross pay unjust or inequitable, and it was not just and equitable to award four weeks’ gross pay. Under section 38 Employment Act 2002, the respondent was ordered to pay £795.16.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded and held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by not paying holiday accrued but untaken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £827 |
| Other | The tribunal recorded a failure to provide written itemised pay statements in September 2024 and found that, when proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. An award of £795.16 was made under section 38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £795 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,622
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.