Case 6009010/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Alboraiki v Kingfisher Industrial Limited and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 6009010/2024
- Decision date
- 23 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Alboraiki
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns Mr A Alboraiki's application dated 28 May 2025 for reconsideration of a judgment dated and sent to the parties on 14 May 2025. Employment Judge Bansal refused the reconsideration application.
The tribunal gave the reason that there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. It relied on the same reasons as those set out in the judgment dated 14 May 2025, and also recorded that no claim for automatic unfair dismissal was made in the Claim Form.
This judgment does not set out the substantive outcomes of the underlying breach of contract, race discrimination, religion or belief discrimination, or unfair dismissal complaints, and it records no remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment decides the claimant's application for reconsideration dated 28 May 2025, refusing it. The underlying claim outcomes from the 14 May 2025 judgment are not set out in this text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.