Case 6009036/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Homer v The Little Inns Wigan Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6009036/2025
- Decision date
- 24 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Homer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr J Homer's breach of contract claim against The Little Inns Wigan Limited for notice pay. The respondent offered no evidence to dispute the amounts claimed. The tribunal awarded £2,240 in damages, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The holiday pay complaint was also upheld. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended. It awarded £1,123.10 for 10 days of outstanding leave, with the claimant responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance.
The two awards total £3,363.10. The accompanying interest notice specified a rate of 8% per annum and a calculation day of 4 August 2026, following the sending of the judgment on 3 August 2026. No interest would be payable if the sums were paid in full within 14 days after the judgment was sent. No monetary amount of interest was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in relation to notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,240 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay for 10 days of accrued but untaken leave was found to be an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,123 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,363
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.