Case 6009044/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Amandeep Kaur v Ivy RIJ Ltd (t/a Karak Chaii) — 2024
- Case reference
- 6009044/2024
- Decision date
- 30 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge DATE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Amandeep Kaur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely at London Central on 24 October 2024 before Employment Judge Plowright sitting alone. The claimant, Ms Amandeep Kaur, appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal amended the respondent's name to Ivy RIJ Ltd (t/a Karak Chaii).
The only claim determined in the judgment was a claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to arrears of pay. The tribunal found that claim well founded and successful.
The respondent was ordered to pay Ms Kaur the gross sum of £4,353.14. The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for payment of tax and National Insurance on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to arrears of pay was well founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £4,353.14. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for tax and National Insurance on that sum. | Upheld | — | £4,353 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,353
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.