Case 6009070/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Scott Urquhart v Alpha Manufacturing Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6009070/2024
- Decision date
- 25 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Scott Urquhart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with an application to amend the claim. It allowed the application so far as it sought to add claims under sections 15, 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal dismissed the application to add a claim of indirect sex discrimination. This was a short oral decision and the written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not to be provided unless requested.
The judgment does not determine the merits of any of the amended claims and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal allowed the application to amend the claim to include claims under sections 15, 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. The substantive merits of those claims were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the application to amend the claim to include indirect sex discrimination. The substantive merits of any sex discrimination claim were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.