Case 6009077/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Marjankowska v Green Commercial Cleaning Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009077/2024
- Decision date
- 16 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Marjankowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cambridge on 26 September 2025, Employment Judge Tynan sitting alone determined that the Claimant's email of 17 June 2024 was not a qualifying disclosure within the meaning of section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The Tribunal therefore found that the Claimant had not made a protected disclosure.
On that basis, the whistleblowing claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The Tribunal held that the Claimant's email of 17 June 2024 was not a qualifying disclosure within section 43B ERA 1996. Because there was therefore no protected disclosure, the claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 43B ERA 1996
- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.