Case 6009084/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Vladimir Kiose v Ozcorp Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009084/2024
- Decision date
- 25 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Vladimir Kiose
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Vladimir Kiose’s claim against Ozcorp Ltd was heard on 23 January 2025 at the East London Hearing Centre by CVP. The respondent was neither present nor represented, had not communicated with the tribunal about its non-attendance, and no response had been presented to the claim. The Employment Judge therefore proceeded in the respondent’s absence under Rule 47 and issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal awarded the claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £450, calculated as one week at a gross weekly wage of £450. It also awarded £900 for notice pay, calculated as two weeks at the same gross weekly wage, subject to any required deductions for tax and national insurance provided the respondent accounts for the payment to HMRC and the claimant. A further award of £578 was made for holiday pay, also subject to deductions as stated in the judgment.
The judgment records no detailed findings beyond the awards and the basis on which they were calculated. Written reasons were not provided because oral reasons were given at the hearing, and the judgment notes that written reasons would only follow if requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded as 1 week x £450 gross weekly wage. | Upheld | — | £450 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded as 2 weeks x £450 gross weekly wage, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance as stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £900 |
| Holiday pay | Award described in the judgment as holiday pay in respect of a complaint of breach of contract, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance as stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £578 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,928
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.