Case 6009104/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Andrew Barber v Premier Motorhomes and Leisure Ltd (In Creditor’s Voluntary Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6009104/2025
- Decision date
- 27 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K. Richardson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Andrew Barber
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr Barber’s complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and recorded that he was unfairly dismissed. The respondent did not attend the hearing, which took place by CVP before Employment Judge K. Richardson on 5 March 2026.
The written record sets out the remedy calculation. The basic award was assessed at 1.5 x £700 x 7, producing £7,350. The compensatory award was calculated by reference to past losses from 18 November 2024 to 5 March 2026, including net weekly loss of £609.18, loss of employer pension contributions at £26 per week, and deduction for earnings received during the period.
For future loss, the tribunal accepted that Mr Barber was looking for alternative work at a comparable level and anticipated finding such employment within a few months, so future loss was limited to 12 weeks. That produced further losses for earnings and pension contributions, again reduced by earnings over the same period. The tribunal then recorded a gross compensatory figure of £45,175.91 before applying the statutory cap of 52 weeks’ pay, which reduced the compensatory award to £37,500.
The total award was therefore £44,850, comprising the £7,350 basic award and £37,500 compensatory award. The recoupment section records a total monetary award of £52,525.91, a prescribed element of £41,640.73 for the period 18 November 2024 to 5 March 2026, and a difference of £10,885.18.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint well-founded and awarded £44,850 in total. The compensatory award was subject to the statutory cap and the judgment also records a recoupment calculation. | Upheld | — | £44,850 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £44,850
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,350
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £37,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.