Case 6009136/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Saliuk v La Tartine London Ltd T/a The Tartine — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009136/2025
- Decision date
- 3 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in which the tribunal recorded that the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages and holiday pay were well-founded. The respondent had failed to pay the claimant her wages for November 2024, December 2024 and January 2025, and also failed to pay for holidays accrued but untaken when the claimant's employment ended.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,718.32, described as the net amount deducted. The judgment also states that the respondent is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. The monetary figure awarded was a single net amount covering the claims together, so it was not split per claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the complaint in respect of holiday pay was well-founded. The monetary figure awarded was a single net amount covering the claims together, so it was not split per claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,718
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.