Case 6009152/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Caleb Gadd v Brighton and Newhaven Fish Sales Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009152/2024
- Decision date
- 10 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Caleb Gadd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to attend the hearing on 10 October 2025 and was not contactable on that date. Orders sent on 11 November 2025 required the claimant to confirm he was pursuing the case and to provide a schedule of loss, but the Tribunal received no correspondence from him.
The respondent applied for strike out on 2 December 2025 and copied the claimant, inviting any objections. The claimant did not respond by 7 January 2026, and Employment Judge Corrigan found that the claim had not been actively pursued and/or that the claimant had not complied with the order. Applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and the overriding objective in Rule 3, the Tribunal struck out the claim and vacated the April 2026 hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim but does not identify the specific underlying cause of action in the PDF text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.