Case 6009203/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Westaway v Oxford Active Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6009203/2025
- Decision date
- 8 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wilkinson Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Westaway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Wilkinson, sitting alone at Watford Employment Tribunal by CVP on 8 January 2026, heard Mr W Westaway's claims against Oxford Active Limited. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent was represented by Miss N Nicholson, a litigation consultant.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages and ordered the respondent to pay £3,502.15 gross within 14 days of the date of judgment unless otherwise agreed. The tribunal also upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid expenses and ordered payment of £680.19 within the same period.
The claimant's application for a costs order was refused. The judgment, approved electronically on 8 January 2026, was sent to the parties on 12 January 2026.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded gross, payable within 14 days of the date of judgment unless otherwise agreed. | Upheld | — | £3,502 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid expenses; judgment does not specify the statutory basis, so classified as breach_of_contract. | Upheld | — | £680 |
| Other | The claimant's application for a costs order was refused. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,182
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.