Case 6009226/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Roberta Ghiotto v Hawkwell House Hotel Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009226/2024
- Decision date
- 19 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reindorf KC
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms L Farrell, Mr A Morgan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Roberta Ghiotto
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a Talent and Culture Coordinator and had ADHD, which the respondent conceded was a disability at the relevant times. The tribunal found that the claimant's ADHD affected concentration, focus and time management, particularly in relation to administrative and payroll work, and that the respondent knew enough about her condition and its effects to be under the relevant Equality Act duties.
The tribunal found that the respondent applied a requirement to undertake payroll tasks without adjustments and failed to take reasonable steps including further training, support, specialist software, removing payroll duties, home working, a private place to work and additional time. It concluded that direct disability discrimination was made out because the claimant's disability was the reason for dismissal, and that dismissal was also because of something arising from disability.
On justification for discrimination arising from disability, the tribunal accepted that accurate payroll was a legitimate aim but found the dismissal was not proportionate. It noted the lack of a job description, limited training arrangements, the failure to make reasonable adjustments, and the decision to end the probationary period early. The claims before the final hearing were upheld and the parties were to be sent notice of a remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination contrary to s.13 Equality Act 2010 in relation to dismissal succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability contrary to s.15 Equality Act 2010 succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments contrary to s.21 Equality Act 2010 succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal by judgment dated 9 April 2025. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that any claim relating to public interest disclosure was dismissed on withdrawal by judgment dated 9 April 2025. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 EqA
- s.15 EqA
- s.21 EqA
- s.20(3) EqA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.