Case 6009235/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mark Slade v Fedcap Employment Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009235/2024
- Decision date
- 18 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge David C.
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mark Slade
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Bristol by Cloud Video Platform on 29 May 2025, before Employment Judge David C. Gardner, the tribunal considered an application to amend the claim under rule 30 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2023 so as to include a complaint under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010, namely a failure to make reasonable adjustments. The application to amend was allowed.
The tribunal also dealt with limitation. It held that the Claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was out of time and dismissed that complaint. In contrast, the complaint of a failure to make reasonable adjustments was found not to be out of time. The written record does not record any substantive merits finding on the reasonable adjustments complaint, only the limitation ruling and amendment decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Held to be out of time and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The application to amend the claim to include a complaint under ss.20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 was allowed. The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments was held not to be out of time. No merits decision is recorded in this written judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.